Global Leaders
View Scores of global leaders and assess how your scores compare for them. You can explore these profiles as reference points — and then apply your own judgment using the same compass.
This lens can be applied to any leader of your choice, global or local
Mapping Power Beyond Rhetoric
Public perception of global leaders is often shaped by headlines, ideology, or loyalty. But leadership in the digital age operates through deeper, repeatable patterns — across platforms, narratives, institutions, and global consequences.
To move beyond opinion, this view applies six civic coordinates — Courage, Empathy, Justice, Imagination, Integrity, and Transparency — to a set of contemporary global leaders, using averaged assessments from four multiple large language models# as a comparative baseline
# LLM average scores represent an interpretive synthesis derived from four large language models (ChatGPT, Grok, Perplexity, and Gemini). They are designed for comparative reflection on system behavior, not as precise empirical measurements. The intent is not to declare verdicts, but to surface structural constraints.
How Scores Are Generated
Scores on this site are produced through comparative synthesis, not manual document-by-document evaluation. They reflect recurring leadership patterns inferred from a curated public corpus—including speeches, interviews, policy documents, and high-quality secondary analyses—as represented in the trained knowledge and outputs of multiple large language models. Rather than asserting factual verdicts, the scoring process surfaces structural signals across six civic coordinates by comparing how leadership behaviors, narratives, and decisions consistently appear across the public record. The resulting scores are best understood as analytical reference points—designed to support reflection, comparison, and dialogue—rather than definitive judgments or exhaustive assessments.
Share your assessments
Submit your Civic Compass Scores – Via google form below (approx. 3 min)
Reader-submitted evaluations of public leaders using the six Civic Compass coordinates developed in Uncle Sam 2.0.
Scores represent personal assessments, not factual claims.
The book 